国考

股价被质疑？投资者犀利发问！4家券商直面回应_我的网站

A |     　　“请问贵司为何在业绩大好的情况下依然持续破净破发？”“10年前投资到现在是亏损的，算上分红，总资产都是亏的。

B |     The UN General Assembly in New York is meeting Tuesday to discuss ways to make the Security Council more representative and equitable.,The meeting, convened by General Assembly President Abdulla Shahid in a letter dated July 7, is tasked with deliberating the “question of equitable representation and an increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council.” Sahid is expected to present a draft oral decision “following consultations” with General Assembly members.,A draft presented on the UN’s website reaffirms “the central role of the General Assembly concerning the question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council,” and expresses “the commitment of heads of state and government representing the peoples of the world to instill new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council.”,The draft proposes the continuation of “intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform” at the upcoming 77th General Assembly in September, including the creation of an “open-ended working group” to discuss the matter.,Background,Created as part of the United Nations after the end of the Second World War, the Security Council consists of the world’s five major nuclear powers (Russia, China, the United States, France, and Britain) and 10 rotating non-permanent members. Collectively, their main goal is the maintenance of international peace and security.,A key difference between the UN and its Security Council and the League of Nations – the defunct intergovernmental organization formed in the aftermath of the First World War, is the inclusion in the former of the right for each permanent member to veto substantive resolutions made by other members, such as accepting new members into the UN, or authorizing the use of force against another country.,The veto concept was a hard-fought victory of the Soviet delegation at the San Francisco conference on the UN’s formation. Moscow argued for the right of veto to prevent one or more major powers from ganging up on others to pursue national geopolitical, economic, or military interests at the expense of others using the UN platform to provide such actions with legitimacy.,The veto principle enabled the Security Council and the UN generally to the survive multiple international crises, both during the Cold War and in the three decades after 1991, and ensured that the UN did not collapse, as its League of Nations predecessor did, in times of crisis.,Putin on 75th Anniversary of WWII: Shared Responsibility to History and Future18 June 2020, 19:47 GMT,Why Reform Now?,The Security Council underwent two major reforms: in 1965, when the original non-permanent membership was increased from six to ten to account for the emergence of new countries in the Global South after the collapse of European colonial empires, and in 1971, when the US dropped its veto to allow the People’s Republic of China to take up its rightful seat at the Security Council, replacing Taiwan.,Discussions on reforming the Security Council began anew in the early 1990s, as the United States and its allies, convinced of their triumph and status as leaders of a new global order following the collapse of the USSR, began discussing the "end of history" and conceptualizing ways to make the 21st century an “American century.” On the other side of the debate, rising powers from the Third World began pushing to reform the UN to make it more representative of their interests.,In 2005, rising economic giants India and Brazil, as well as Germany and Japan, the defeated Axis powers, formed the so-called G4 group of nations to support one another’s push for permanent Security Council membership. In 2005, then-UN Secretary General Kofi Annan put forward a proposal to expand the council to 24 members, either by creating six new permanent members and three new non-permanent ones, or eight new non-permanent members of a new class of rotating members and one additional non-permanent seat. In 2017, the G4 announced their readiness to temporarily accept non-veto wielding status to become permanent Security Council members.,Opponents of reforming the Security Council have made arguments on the basis of perceived balance of power-related concerns, such as Pakistan opposing India’s permanent membership, or Spain and Italy opposing German membership, South Korea opposing Japanese membership, and major Latin American powers like Argentina, Mexico, and Colombia opposing Brazil’s membership. Other rising powers, such as Turkey, have argued in favor of the Security Council’s expansion to better represent Asian, Latin American, and African countries.,Moscow has paid a heavy price for its permanent membership in the Security Council, first through its central role in defeating Nazi Germany and Japan during the Second World War, and then in 1991, by taking upon itself the entirety of the USSR’s $66 billion perestroika-era debt after the country’s collapse. But Russia has also expressed support for reforming the body to better represent developing nations, particularly India and Brazil, as well as a candidate from Africa. At BRICS summits in 2021 and 2022, Russia and China reiterated their continued support for improving the BRICS’ status at the UN, including via a comprehensive reform of the Security Council.,Iran Asks to Join BRICS27 June, 17:19 GMT,In recent months, these calls have grown louder, with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov indicating in April that countries from the Global South would be an excellent way to curb the “unilateralism” of the West at the UN.,Last week, Russian Ambassador to China Andrei Denisov reaffirmed Russia’s readiness to discuss the expansion of the Security Council to provide membership to India and Brazil, but not US allies Germany and Japan.,“Russia is calling for the expansion of the UN Security Council based on a broad consensus. It requires increasing the proportionate share of African, Asian and Latin American countries for the UN Security Council to be able to reflect the aspirations of people around the world and be a more democratic body,” Denisov said, speaking at the World Peace Forum in Beijing on July 4.,“At the same time, I would like to be frank – we aren’t ready to support the accession of actors such as Germany and Japan. We don’t see any added value from their potential accession. Given the current balance on the Council – or imbalance, I should say, the membership of the two aforementioned candidates is unlikely to strengthen it, rather it will make the imbalance even more striking,” the diplomat stressed.,An Idea Whose Time Has Come?,“It appears that all nations are aware that the UNSC must become more inclusive and representative of the reality of today’s world,” says Paolo Raffone, director of the CIPI Foundation, a Brussels-based think tank.,According to the observer, apart from the 1971 modification of the Council to reflect China taking over Taiwan’s seat, the UNSC of today still largely “reflects the world of 1945.”,“For many years the UNSC has been blocked by cross-veto proceedings, affecting stability and peace in the world. Unblocking the UNSC is the most urgent need for all nations wishing for the effectiveness of a rule-based international systems,” Raffone argues.,Raffone favors adding BRICS countries into the mix, pointing to their collective status representing “the largest share of world population, land and [purchasing power parity],” as well as “spectacular” economic growth over the past two decades. “Their inclusion in the UNSC would certainly strive to keep globalization alive under new rules and governance,” and reduce problems such as lack of democracy, poor geographical representation, and “lack of legitimacy for ensuring global governance” of the current body, he believes.,The observer emphasizes, however, that for any reform initiative to succeed, two-thirds of the UN’s member states would have vote for and ratify it, with every permanent member of the Security Council also needing to agree – no easy task to pull off.,EXCLUSIVE: New Delhi Does Not Support Attempts to Isolate Russia, Says Russian Ambassador to India5 July, 10:29 GMT,New Multipolar World Order,“The enlargement of the UN Security Council would formally certify, on the international level, the transition from US unipolarism to the new multipolar architecture. It would be an epochal event!” says Tiberio Graziani, chairman of Vision & Global Trends: International Institute for Global Analyses, an Italy-based international affairs think tank.,Graziani is convinced that the benefits from the body’s expansion would be multifold, including rebalancing power in international organizations “hitherto essentially ‘Westernist’” and “hegemonized” by the West. “Above all,” he says, “enlargement would be essential to ensure greater stability” in the “turbulent geopolitical and geo-economic transition” that the present moment represents.,The observer stresses that any reforms would need to be gradual to prevent an institutional crisis, but admits that “some reforms must be radical,” given the organization’s dominance by Western powers.,Like Raffone, Graziani supports the increased visibility of BRICS nations in the body, citing their outsized significance to global security and the economy and underrepresentation in this sense.,“At the moment we are in a particular situation: on the one hand there is the West led by the United States and the British which constitutes a conservative pole that aims to maintain a hegemonic role on a planetary level, on the other hand there is a set of nations (basically the BRICS countries) which demand a greater presence in global decisions. Within the framework of the UN, the contribution of the BRICS countries would be fundamental since it would guarantee a balance that has not been there so far,” Graziani believes.,The observer stresses that there simply is no alternative to the UN’s authority in international affairs, and that subsequently, “a new, more balanced (multipolar) international forum needs to be set up” in the present situation.。”
　　近日，已有4家券商召开了上半年业绩发布会。券商股股价是投资者关注的重中之重。中信证券、国泰海通、中信建投、光大证券均回应了股价问题。　　光大证券称，将积极研究股票回购等的法律法规及可行性。

C | 国泰海通表示，将研究和考虑进一步丰富价值运营和价值实现手段，促进公司股价合理反映公司的投资价值。

D | 　　券商股股价被质疑　　在中信建投业绩说明会上，投资者提问称，尽管公司上半年净利润大增近七成，且分红丰厚，但近期股价表现相对平淡。在当前资本市场环境下，公司计划通过哪些具体的投资者关系活动（如常态化路演、反向调研等），向市场更清晰地传递公司在“科技金融”、“数智投行”等领域的长期投资价值，以引导市场对公司内在价值的合理定价？　　中信建投答复称，公司高度重视投资者沟通，也充分理解市场对公司科技金融、数智投行战略布局的关切。

E | 公司将持续加强投资者关系管理：线下通过业绩说明会、路演、反向路演等活动深化面对面交流；线上积极运用数字化手段，依托官网投资者关系平台、官方公众号等渠道，多样化分享发展动态，及时传递公司在科技金融、数智投行等领域的进展。
　　在光大证券业绩会上，投资者称，公司说将一如既往给投资者回报，可是5年前投资光大证券到现在是亏损的，10年前投资到现在也是亏损的。已经算上了分红，总资产都是亏的。能否改变下方式，别一如既往。

F | 走条新路，例如回购股份呢？　　光大证券表示，公司一直以来持续加强经营管理，努力实现高质量发展，通过提升业绩、股东分红来提升股东回报；公司也持续合法合规地开展市值管理，综合运用经营提升、现金分红、投资者关系管理、信息披露等方式提升公司投资价值，为投资者创造长期投资价值，切实维护全体股东的长远利益。公司会在符合相关法律法规及监管政策要求的前提下，根据市场环境和行业趋势、公司自身实际情况积极研究股票回购等的法律法规及可行性。
　　国泰海通投资者提问称：“请问贵司为何在业绩大好和积极市值管理的情况下依然持续破净破发？”　　国泰海通回应称，公司高度重视市值管理工作，致力于通过打造公司内在价值创造能力提升公司长期投资价值，并综合运用常态化分红、并购重组、股权激励、股份回购、强化投资者关系管理与信息披露等多种方式促进公司股价合理反映公司的投资价值。经营业绩方面，盈利能力显著提升。现金分红方面，连续第三年开展中期分红，分红比例保持较高水平。回购注销方面，公司将承继自原海通证券的4779万股A股回购股份的用途从“维护公司价值及股东权益”变更为“用于注销并减少公司注册资本”，并已于8月完成注销，进一步维护投资者利益、增强投资者信心。

G | 未来，公司将持续关注资本市场动态及公司股价表现，在夯实核心竞争力的基础上，结合公司实际情况，研究和考虑进一步丰富价值运营和价值实现手段，促进公司股价合理反映公司的投资价值，努力提升投资者回报水平，切实维护全体股东的长远利益。　　中信证券投资者提问称，公司近几年业绩持续向好，利润大涨。可股票两年来不仅没有涨且严重跑输上证指数。公司如何让股价匹配业绩增长？　　中信证券回应称，公司高度重视市值管理与投资者回报，2026年上半年，公司连续第六年以直播形式召开年度业绩说明会，累计开展投资者调研交流、策略会路演等各类机构投资者投关活动20余场，累计接听股东热线1400余次，通过股东邮箱、上证e互动平台、股东会现场交流等方式及时回应中小投资者关切。公司始终坚持与投资者共享经营发展成果的理念，自2003年A股上市以来连续24年开展现金分红，累计分红总额（含税）超人民币990亿元。今年公司也将连续第三年开展中期现金分红，拟每10股派发人民币4.27元（含税），派发现金红利总额人民币66.72亿元（含税），分红金额相比去年中期分红增长55.23%，后续将待公司股东会审议通过后有序实施，公司股东回报感和获得感将进一步增强。　　如何改变“靠天吃饭”？　　记者注意到，在现场的提问中，也有一些与券商业务相关的，比如科创板跟投浮盈的可持续性、两融业务的流动性、如何改变“靠天吃饭”问题等。　　投资者提问称，管理层如何看待“靠天吃饭”的周期属性？在打造“价值投行、新质投行、数智投行”的战略下，公司未来如何平滑市场波动对业绩的冲击，建立真正不依赖单边行情的内生增长模式？　　中信建投称，证券行业具有天然的周期属性，这是客观事实，公司也不能完全“脱敏”。价值投行最终会推动收入结构的价值型转型，提升主动管理、买方投顾、非方向交易等业务收入占比，用更稳的收入结构对冲周期波动；新质投行就是锚定新质生产力这个长期赛道，把公司的增长锚从市场成交量切换到国家的产业升级趋势上，包括服务长鑫科技、长江存储等企业，是把市场的β，转化为投行专业的α；数智投行能让公司用好更先进的金融科技，通过客户驱动精准挖掘综合价值、提升运营效率，用效率对冲波动。公司战略层层递进，目标就是打造不依赖单边行情的内生增长能力，同时也抓住顺周期的增长空间沉淀客户和服务能力护城河，公司也有战略定力，用持续的业绩结构改善回应投资者的期待。　　科创板跟投是热点。有投资者问中信证券，上半年公司业绩大增，部分得益于科创板IPO跟投项目（如联讯仪器、臻宝科技）实现的较高浮盈。随着下半年宇树科技等优质项目上市，请问管理层如何评估当前二级市场波动对这些跟投浮盈的潜在冲击？在“保荐+跟投”模式下，公司如何防范底层资产风险向券商自营盘传导？　　中信证券表示，公司针对券商直投、科创板投行跟投业务制定了稳健审慎的投资策略和完整健全的管理体系，通过分级授权、分散投资、定期排查、风险分类、统一监控、协同处置等多项风险管控手段，实现了项目投前阶段风险管理前置、项目投后阶段多角度监控预警、项目退出阶段多样化管控的项目全周期风险管理。　　两融业务也受到关注。投资者称，截至期末，公司融资融券余额达1086.14亿元，市场占比3.60%。

H | 在信用业务规模稳步做大的同时，请问公司目前的流动性覆盖率和净稳定资金率是否留有充足的安全垫？在应对极端市场波动时，财务端有哪些具体的压力测试与资金调配预案？　　中信建投表示，截至2026年6月末，公司流动性覆盖率和净稳定资金率均符合监管要求。公司每季度针对资产负债规模开展压力测试，考虑市场环境恶化、信用风险事件、评级下调等风险因素设置轻度、中度和重度的压力情景，公司的各项风险控制指标（含流动性覆盖率和净稳定资金率）均符合监管要求，并有充足安全垫，市场风险组合损失也在公司的风险容忍度范围内。此外，公司维持规模适度、结构合理、独立管理的流动性储备资产组合，以及品种丰富、额度充足的融资工具，可以及时、有效地为公司融资融券等业务发展提供充足资金。（文章来源：券商中国）。

Current article:http://bf7o3.shouyouxumianpouluanteng.shop/list_x5jfv/x8l.html

Published on:09:44:41